"Nationology": Nations as Gravitational Fields of Human Culture by Chris Welzel
On November 26, WVSA Vice-President Professor Chris Welzel spoke on "Nationology": Nations as Gravitational Fields of Human Culture at the latest edition of the Culture and Values Webinar Series organized by Plamen Akaliyski.
Christian Welzel is a Chair of Political Culture Research at Leuphana University in Lueneburg, Germany, and he is also a vice-president of the World Values Survey Association. In his prolific scholarship, he is most well-known for his research on human empowerment, which includes the origin and development of emancipative values and their importance for democracy and societal flourishing.
On Nationology: Nations as Cultural Gravity Fields
Nations have been questioned as meaningful units for analyzing culture due to their allegedly limited variance-capturing power and large internal heterogeneity. Against this skepticism, we argue that culture is by definition a collective phenomenon and focusing on individual differences contradicts the very concept of culture. Through the “miracle of aggregation,” we can eliminate random noise and arbitrary variation at the individual level in order to distill the central cultural tendencies of nations. Accordingly, we depict national culture as a gravitational field that socializes individuals into the orbit of a nation’s central cultural tendency. Even though individuals are also exposed to other gravitational forces, subcultures in turn gravitate within the limited orbit of their national culture. Using data from the World Values Survey, we show that individual values cluster in concentric circles around their nation’s cultural gravity center. We reveal the miracle of aggregation by demonstrating that nations capture the bulk of the variation in the individuals’ cultural values once they are aggregated into lower-level territorial units such as towns and sub-national regions. We visualize the gravitational force of national cultures by plotting various intra-national groups from five large countries that form distinct national clusters. Contrary to many scholars’ intuitions, alternative social aggregates, such as ethnic, linguistic, and religious groups, as well as diverse socio-demographic categories, add negligible explained variance to that already captured by nations.
Link to the paper: On “Nationology”: The Gravitational Field of National Culture
Or to the text in ResearchGate: