Join us for the WVS webinar on June 27, where our guest speaker, Amy Adamczyk from John Jay College of Criminal Justice and The Graduate Center, City University of New York, explores global public opinion on abortion. The analysis across 88 countries shows that national context—particularly religious importance, economic development, and gender inequality—plays a key role in shaping abortion attitudes beyond individual-level factors. The presentation highlights how support for abortion varies globally, with notable trends such as declining justification in China despite growing tolerance for other moral issues. These findings offer insights into how public opinion on abortion is shaped by broader cultural and political forces across societies.

Join us for the WVS webinar on July 15, where WVSA Vice-President Prof. Dr. Christian Welzel of Leuphana University Lüneburg will discuss the resilience of autocratic regimes in the face of modernization. Drawing on data from a multilevel moderation study, the presentation examines how authoritarian systems attempt to block the psychological effects of development, yet ultimately fail to suppress the rise of emancipatory values. These findings offer new insights into the internal contradictions of modernizing autocracies and their growing vulnerability over time.

The WVSA is delighted to present this year’s Ronald F. Inglehart Honorary Lecture award to Robert Mattes, Professor of Government and Public Policy at the University of Strathclyde, UK. A leading expert on democratic attitudes, Robert Mattes spoke on “Anti-Democratic Parties and Popular Support for Democracy.” The lecture examined how such parties shape citizens’ views on democratic governance.

Join us for the WVS webinar on June 18, where our guest speaker, Francesco Rigoli from City St Georges, University of London, examines ideological extremism and polarization on a global scale, across the different countries of the world. He identifies how certain national characteristics, such as levels of modernization, influence the degree of polarization in various domains like economics, gender equality, and immigration. The findings reveal that polarization is often higher in less modernized countries, though in some issues, more modernized societies show deeper divides.

Join us for the WVS webinar on April 25, where our guest speakers, Jan Aart Scholte from Leiden University and Soetkin Verhaegen from Maastricht University, will explore the elite-citizen gap in confidence toward international organizations using data from the World Values Survey and a parallel elite survey. Their analysis across five countries shows that elites express significantly higher confidence than the general public, with individual-level factors such as socioeconomic status, political values, and institutional trust helping to explain this gap. The presentation offers insights into how legitimacy is perceived differently across societal groups and what this means for the future of global governance.

Join us for the WVS webinar on April 08, where our guest speaker, Ursula Hoffmann-Lange from the University of Bamberg, Germany will examine the global development of democracy since the 1990s, using survey data from 89 countries that participated in the World Values Survey (WVS) and the European Values Study (EVS) to analyze political support across different regime types and world regions. The study finds that while global democratic quality has declined since the mid-2000s, the decline has been less severe than suggested by Freedom House and V-Dem, as it is largely concentrated in a few populous countries, while democracy has remained stable when all countries are weighted equally.

Join us for the WVS webinar on March 25, where our guest speaker, Anneli Kaasa examines the challenge posed by the abundance of cultural models that define values, attitudes, beliefs, and norms across countries and regions, noting that while many models exist, their differences can be more confusing than helpful. Through empirical analyses using WVS data, the author explores how modern cultural models—such as Inglehart’s, Minkov’s revision of Hofstede’s, and Schwartz’s—are essentially rotations of each other, capturing the same cultural elements but grouping them differently. Ultimately, the research finds that by systematically merging these models, it becomes possible to create a framework that allows researchers to better relate various cultural dimensions, enhancing the ability to compare and generalize findings across disciplines.

Join us for the WVS webinar on April 29, where our guest speaker, Yunsoo Lee from the School of Political Science and Public Administration, Shandong University, China, will explore the relationship between personality traits and trust in government, recognizing that individual differences shape perceptions of governmental institutions. Using Chinese survey data from the World Values Survey, the study examines how specific personality traits influence trust in different branches of government. The findings reveal that extraversion is negatively associated with overall government trust, agreeableness is positively linked to it, and neuroticism correlates positively with trust in courts and the police, highlighting the nuanced ways personality shapes political attitudes.

Join us for the WVS webinar on May 20, where our guest speaker, Xavier Javines Bilon from the University Philiipines Diliman, will explore predictors of homonegativity in Southeast Asia using World Values Survey (WVS) data, identifying four value-based and one demographic factor that consistently influence attitudes across six countries. The study finds that endorsements of equality, choice, and agnosticism are linked to lower homonegativity, while relativism and older age are associated with higher homonegativity, highlighting both a shared emancipative logic in the region and the need for contextually sensitive models to better understand and address sexual prejudice in different cultural contexts.

Join us for the WVS webinar on May 27, where our guest speaker, Junji Kageyama from Meikai University, Japan, will explore national parochialism by introducing a survey-based measurement approach using data from the World Values Survey and European Values Survey, allowing for broader cross-country analysis with rich demographic and socioeconomic insights. The study validates this new measure by confirming its alignment with experimental findings and identifying key demographic and political correlates, such as sex, education, political ideology, native status, age, and economic security, showing that individuals in socially insecure positions tend to be more parochial. Additionally, the research uncovers that the COVID-19 pandemic heightened national parochialism, highlighting both the potential and limitations of policy interventions aimed at mitigating its effects.